MOJAQ vs UptimeRobot: uptime, plus context
UptimeRobot is a mature, popular monitoring service with a generous free tier and probes all over the world. Both tools cover HTTP checks and heartbeats; what MOJAQ adds is EU data residency and uptime that sits in one account with your errors, logs and deploys. Here is the honest split of where each one wins.
EU-hosted in Helsinki · GDPR-native · free during the private beta
At a glance
| MOJAQ | UptimeRobot | |
|---|---|---|
| Monitor types | HTTP, TCP, ICMP, DNS, gRPC, push-heartbeat | HTTP, keyword, ping, port, SSL, heartbeat/cron |
| Heartbeat / dead-man | Yes — beside your errors & deploys | Yes — cron/heartbeat |
| Probe locations | EU origin | Many global locations |
| Data residency | EU — Helsinki, DPA included | Varies |
| Status pages | Public, custom domain & branding | Public status pages |
| Incident context | Beside errors, logs & deploys | Uptime-focused |
| Track record | New — private beta | Established, large free tier |
Where UptimeRobot is the better choice
UptimeRobot has years in the market and a famously generous free tier, and if what you need is a large number of simple external checks from many locations around the world, that reach is a real advantage. Its probe network spans more regions than MOJAQ runs today, so for global latency-sensitive checking from many vantage points, it is the more proven option.
It is also the safer pick if uptime is a standalone concern for you and you do not want a broader platform. A focused tool you already trust, with a big free allowance, is a perfectly good answer — MOJAQ is not claiming otherwise.
Where MOJAQ fits better
MOJAQ wins on residency and context. Your monitor names, endpoints and incident history are a fairly precise map of your infrastructure, so MOJAQ keeps them on dedicated EU infrastructure with a DPA rather than shipping that map to a non-EU service. For an EU team, that is the same category of decision as where the database lives.
The other draw is context. UptimeRobot also offers heartbeats, but in MOJAQ uptime and heartbeats live in the same account as your errors, logs and deploys — so an outage or a missed backup lines up with the deploy that triggered it and the errors that followed, instead of living in a separate tab. For a team that wants uptime, heartbeats and status pages beside the rest of its telemetry in the EU, that is the pull — and every tool is free during the beta.
Moving from UptimeRobot
Recreate your existing checks in MOJAQ (name, URL and interval), then add heartbeats for the jobs you run yourself so a silent failure becomes an alert. Point your status page at the new monitors and confirm alert channels — Slack, Discord, webhook or email — deliver. Run both tools briefly if you want overlap, then retire the old account once you trust the coverage.
Questions
What is a heartbeat monitor, and does UptimeRobot have one?
A heartbeat, or dead-man switch, is a URL your own job pings when it runs; if the ping stops arriving, the check goes down. Both MOJAQ and UptimeRobot offer heartbeat monitoring for this. The MOJAQ difference is that it is EU-hosted and sits in the same account as your errors, logs and deploys.
Where does UptimeRobot win?
On maturity and reach: a long track record, a generous free tier and many global probe locations. If you mainly need lots of simple external checks from many regions, UptimeRobot is a proven, focused choice.
Why choose MOJAQ for uptime?
EU data residency for your monitoring and incident data, heartbeat monitoring for the jobs you run yourself, and context: uptime sits next to your errors, logs and deploys, so an outage lines up with the release and errors behind it.
Does MOJAQ offer public status pages?
Yes. MOJAQ includes public status pages with a custom domain and branding, alongside HTTP, TCP, ICMP, DNS, gRPC and push-heartbeat monitor types.
Uptime, heartbeats and status pages — in the EU
Catch the failed check and the job that never ran, beside your errors and deploys. Free while we are in beta.
Request beta access →